Mitch 3000

Overview

  • Sectors Health Care
  • Posted Jobs 0
  • Viewed 5
Bottom Promo

Company Description

Generative Artificial Intelligence

Improvements in transformer-based deep neural networks, especially big language models (LLMs), made it possible for an AI boom of generative AI systems in the early 2020s. These consist of chatbots such as ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, and LLaMA; text-to-image expert system image generation systems such as Stable Diffusion, Midjourney, and DALL-E; and text-to-video AI generators such as Sora. [9] [10] [11] [12] Companies such as OpenAI, Anthropic, Microsoft, Google, and Baidu in addition to numerous smaller sized firms have actually developed generative AI designs. [7] [13] [14]

Generative AI has uses throughout a broad range of markets, consisting of software development, health care, finance, entertainment, consumer service, [15] sales and marketing, [16] art, writing, [17] style, [18] and product design. [19] However, issues have actually been raised about the possible abuse of generative AI such as cybercrime, using fake news or deepfakes to deceive or control individuals, and the mass replacement of human tasks. [20] [21] Intellectual property law issues likewise exist around generative designs that are trained on and emulate copyrighted masterpieces. [22]

Early history

Since its beginning, researchers in the field have raised philosophical and ethical arguments about the nature of the human mind and the effects of developing artificial beings with human-like intelligence; these concerns have actually previously been explored by myth, fiction and philosophy given that antiquity. [23] The principle of automatic art go back a minimum of to the automata of ancient Greek civilization, where innovators such as Daedalus and Hero of Alexandria were explained as having actually created devices efficient in writing text, producing sounds, and playing music. [24] [25] The tradition of creative automations has actually grown throughout history, exemplified by Maillardet’s automaton developed in the early 1800s. [26] Markov chains have long been utilized to design natural languages given that their development by Russian mathematician Andrey Markov in the early 20th century. Markov released his first paper on the subject in 1906, [27] [28] and evaluated the pattern of vowels and consonants in the novel Eugeny Onegin using Markov chains. Once a Markov chain is learned on a text corpus, it can then be used as a probabilistic text generator. [29] [30]

Academic artificial intelligence

The academic discipline of synthetic intelligence was developed at a research workshop held at Dartmouth College in 1956 and has actually experienced a number of waves of advancement and optimism in the decades because. [31] Artificial Intelligence research study started in the 1950s with works like Computing Machinery and Intelligence (1950) and the 1956 Dartmouth Summer Research Project on AI. Since the 1950s, artists and scientists have used artificial intelligence to develop artistic works. By the early 1970s, Harold Cohen was developing and displaying generative AI works created by AARON, the computer program Cohen developed to produce paintings. [32]

The terms generative AI planning or generative preparation were utilized in the 1980s and 1990s to refer to AI preparing systems, specifically computer-aided procedure planning, utilized to generate series of actions to reach a defined goal. [33] [34] Generative AI planning systems used symbolic AI methods such as state space search and restriction complete satisfaction and were a “fairly fully grown” innovation by the early 1990s. They were used to generate crisis action prepare for military usage, [35] procedure prepare for manufacturing [33] and decision strategies such as in model self-governing spacecraft. [36]

Generative neural nets (2014-2019)

Since its creation, the field of artificial intelligence used both discriminative models and generative designs, to design and predict information. Beginning in the late 2000s, the emergence of deep learning drove development and research in image category, speech recognition, natural language processing and other tasks. Neural networks in this era were normally trained as discriminative models, due to the trouble of generative modeling. [37]

In 2014, improvements such as the variational autoencoder and generative adversarial network produced the very first useful deep neural networks efficient in discovering generative designs, instead of discriminative ones, for intricate data such as images. These deep generative models were the first to output not just class labels for images however also whole images.

In 2017, the Transformer network allowed advancements in generative designs compared to older Long-Short Term Memory designs, [38] causing the first generative pre-trained transformer (GPT), understood as GPT-1, in 2018. [39] This was followed in 2019 by GPT-2 which showed the capability to generalize without supervision to various jobs as a Foundation model. [40]

The brand-new generative designs introduced during this period enabled for big neural networks to be trained using unsupervised learning or semi-supervised knowing, instead of the monitored knowing common of discriminative designs. Unsupervised knowing eliminated the requirement for humans to by hand identify information, enabling for bigger networks to be trained. [41]

Generative AI boom (2020-)

In March 2020, 15. ai, produced by an anonymous MIT researcher, was a totally free web application that might produce persuading character voices utilizing very little training information. [42] The platform is credited as the very first mainstream service to promote AI voice cloning (audio deepfakes) in memes and content production, influencing subsequent advancements in voice AI innovation. [43] [44]

In 2021, the introduction of DALL-E, a transformer-based pixel generative model, marked an advance in AI-generated images. [45] This was followed by the releases of Midjourney and Stable Diffusion in 2022, which even more democratized access to high-quality synthetic intelligence art production from natural language triggers. [46] These systems showed unprecedented abilities in producing photorealistic images, artwork, and creates based upon text descriptions, causing widespread adoption among artists, designers, and the basic public.

In late 2022, the general public release of ChatGPT reinvented the ease of access and application of generative AI for general-purpose text-based tasks. [47] The system’s ability to engage in natural conversations, generate imaginative content, assist with coding, and perform numerous analytical jobs caught worldwide attention and triggered widespread discussion about AI’s prospective impact on work, education, and imagination. [48]

In March 2023, GPT-4’s release represented another jump in generative AI capabilities. A group from Microsoft Research controversially argued that it “might fairly be seen as an early (yet still incomplete) version of an artificial general intelligence (AGI) system.” [49] However, this evaluation was objected to by other scholars who preserved that generative AI stayed “still far from reaching the standard of ‘general human intelligence'” since 2023. [50] Later in 2023, Meta launched ImageBind, an AI model integrating numerous methods consisting of text, images, video, thermal information, 3D data, audio, and motion, paving the method for more immersive generative AI applications. [51]

In December 2023, Google revealed Gemini, a multimodal AI design available in 4 versions: Ultra, Pro, Flash, and Nano. [52] The company incorporated Gemini Pro into its Bard chatbot and revealed strategies for “Bard Advanced” powered by the larger Gemini Ultra model. [53] In February 2024, Google unified Bard and Duet AI under the Gemini brand, launching a mobile app on Android and incorporating the service into the Google app on iOS. [54]

In March 2024, Anthropic released the Claude 3 household of big language designs, including Claude 3 Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus. [55] The models showed considerable improvements in abilities across various standards, with Claude 3 Opus notably surpassing leading models from OpenAI and Google. [56] In June 2024, Anthropic launched Claude 3.5 Sonnet, which showed improved efficiency compared to the larger Claude 3 Opus, especially in areas such as coding, multistep workflows, and image analysis. [57]

According to a study by SAS and Coleman Parkes Research, China has emerged as an international leader in generative AI adoption, with 83% of Chinese respondents utilizing the innovation, going beyond both the worldwide average of 54% and the U.S. rate of 65%. This management is more evidenced by China’s copyright developments in the field, with a UN report revealing that Chinese entities submitted over 38,000 generative AI patents from 2014 to 2023, significantly going beyond the United States in patent applications. [58]

Modalities

A generative AI system is built by applying unsupervised device knowing (conjuring up for example neural network architectures such as generative adversarial networks (GANs), variation autoencoders (VAEs), transformers, or self-supervised maker finding out trained on a dataset. The abilities of a generative AI system depend upon the modality or kind of the information set utilized. Generative AI can be either unimodal or multimodal; unimodal systems take just one type of input, whereas multimodal systems can take more than one type of input. [59] For instance, one variation of OpenAI’s GPT-4 accepts both text and image inputs. [60]

Text

Generative AI systems trained on words or word tokens include GPT-3, GPT-4, GPT-4o, LaMDA, LLaMA, BLOOM, Gemini and others (see List of large language models). They are capable of natural language processing, maker translation, and natural language generation and can be utilized as structure designs for other jobs. [62] Data sets include BookCorpus, Wikipedia, and others (see List of text corpora).

Code

In addition to natural language text, large language models can be trained on programming language text, permitting them to create source code for brand-new computer system programs. [63] Examples include OpenAI Codex and the VS Code fork Cursor. [64]

Images

Producing high-quality visual art is a popular application of generative AI. [65] Generative AI systems trained on sets of images with text captions include Imagen, DALL-E, Midjourney, Adobe Firefly, FLUX.1, Stable Diffusion and others (see Expert system art, Generative art, and Synthetic media). They are frequently utilized for text-to-image generation and neural style transfer. [66] Datasets consist of LAION-5B and others (see List of datasets in computer vision and image processing).

Audio

Generative AI can also be trained extensively on audio clips to produce natural-sounding speech synthesis and text-to-speech abilities. An early pioneer in this field was 15. ai, launched in March 2020, which showed the ability to clone character voices utilizing as low as 15 seconds of training data. [67] The website got prevalent attention for its capability to produce emotionally meaningful speech for different fictional characters, though it was later on taken offline in 2022 due to copyright concerns. [68] [69] [70] Commercial alternatives consequently emerged, consisting of ElevenLabs’ context-aware synthesis tools and Meta Platform’s Voicebox. [71]

Generative AI systems such as MusicLM [72] and MusicGen [73] can likewise be trained on the audio waveforms of taped music in addition to text annotations, in order to generate new musical samples based on text descriptions such as a relaxing violin tune backed by a distorted guitar riff.

Music

Audio deepfakes of lyrics have actually been generated, like the song Savages, which used AI to imitate rap artist Jay-Z’s vocals. Music artist’s instrumentals and lyrics are copyrighted but their voices aren’t protected from regenerative AI yet, raising a debate about whether artists should get royalties from audio deepfakes. [74]

Many AI music generators have been created that can be created using a text expression, category choices, and looped libraries of bars and riffs. [75]

Video

Generative AI trained on annotated video can produce temporally-coherent, in-depth and photorealistic video. Examples consist of Sora by OpenAI, [12] Gen-1 and Gen-2 by Runway, [76] and Make-A-Video by Meta Platforms. [77]

Actions

Generative AI can also be trained on the motions of a robotic system to generate new trajectories for movement planning or navigation. For example, UniPi from Google Research utilizes prompts like “choose up blue bowl” or “clean plate with yellow sponge” to control movements of a robotic arm. [78] Multimodal “vision-language-action” designs such as Google’s RT-2 can perform rudimentary thinking in reaction to user prompts and visual input, such as getting a toy dinosaur when offered the prompt choice up the extinct animal at a table filled with toy animals and other items. [79]

3D modeling

Artificially smart computer-aided design (CAD) can use text-to-3D, image-to-3D, and video-to-3D to automate 3D modeling. [80] AI-based CAD libraries could also be developed utilizing connected open data of schematics and diagrams. [81] AI CAD assistants are used as tools to help enhance workflow. [82]

Software and hardware

Generative AI models are used to power chatbot products such as ChatGPT, shows tools such as GitHub Copilot, [83] text-to-image products such as Midjourney, and text-to-video products such as Runway Gen-2. [84] Generative AI functions have been incorporated into a range of existing commercially available products such as Microsoft Office (Microsoft Copilot), [85] Google Photos, [86] and the Adobe Suite (Adobe Firefly). [87] Many generative AI models are likewise readily available as open-source software application, consisting of Stable Diffusion and the LLaMA [88] language model.

Smaller generative AI designs with approximately a couple of billion parameters can operate on mobile phones, embedded gadgets, and computers. For instance, LLaMA-7B (a variation with 7 billion criteria) can operate on a Raspberry Pi 4 [89] and one variation of Stable Diffusion can run on an iPhone 11. [90]

Larger models with tens of billions of parameters can run on laptop or desktop computer systems. To attain an appropriate speed, designs of this size might require accelerators such as the GPU chips produced by NVIDIA and AMD or the Neural Engine consisted of in Apple silicon products. For example, the 65 billion criterion variation of LLaMA can be set up to run on a desktop PC. [91]

The benefits of running generative AI in your area include defense of personal privacy and copyright, and avoidance of rate restricting and censorship. The subreddit r/LocalLLaMA in specific focuses on utilizing consumer-grade gaming graphics cards [92] through such strategies as compression. That online forum is among only two sources Andrej Karpathy trusts for language design standards. [93] Yann LeCun has actually promoted open-source models for their value to vertical applications [94] and for improving AI security. [95]

Language designs with numerous billions of specifications, such as GPT-4 or PaLM, normally run on datacenter computers geared up with varieties of GPUs (such as NVIDIA’s H100) or AI accelerator chips (such as Google’s TPU). These extremely big designs are generally accessed as cloud services online.

In 2022, the United States New Export Controls on Advanced Computing and Semiconductors to China imposed limitations on exports to China of GPU and AI accelerator chips used for generative AI. [96] Chips such as the NVIDIA A800 [97] and the Biren Technology BR104 [98] were developed to satisfy the requirements of the sanctions.

There is free software on the marketplace efficient in recognizing text created by generative expert system (such as GPTZero), along with images, audio or video originating from it. [99] Potential mitigation techniques for detecting generative AI content consist of digital watermarking, content authentication, info retrieval, and machine knowing classifier designs. [100] Despite claims of precision, both totally free and paid AI text detectors have actually regularly produced incorrect positives, erroneously implicating students of sending AI-generated work. [101] [102]

Law and regulation

In the United States, a group of business including OpenAI, Alphabet, and Meta signed a voluntary contract with the Biden administration in July 2023 to watermark AI-generated content. [103] In October 2023, Executive Order 14110 used the Defense Production Act to require all US companies to report info to the federal government when training specific high-impact AI models. [104] [105]

In the European Union, the proposed Artificial Intelligence Act consists of requirements to disclose copyrighted product utilized to train generative AI systems, and to identify any AI-generated output as such. [106] [107]

In China, the Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services presented by the Cyberspace Administration of China manages any public-facing generative AI. It consists of requirements to watermark produced images or videos, policies on training data and label quality, limitations on personal information collection, and a standard that generative AI must “comply with socialist core values”. [108] [109]

Copyright

Training with copyrighted content

Generative AI systems such as ChatGPT and Midjourney are trained on large, publicly readily available datasets that consist of copyrighted works. AI developers have argued that such training is safeguarded under fair usage, while copyright holders have argued that it infringes their rights. [110]

Proponents of fair use training have actually argued that it is a transformative use and does not include making copies of copyrighted works offered to the general public. [110] Critics have argued that image generators such as Midjourney can create nearly-identical copies of some copyrighted images, [111] which generative AI programs compete with the content they are trained on. [112]

Since 2024, several suits associated with the use of copyrighted product in training are ongoing. Getty Images has actually sued Stability AI over the usage of its images to train Stable diffusion. [113] Both the Authors Guild and The New York City Times have actually sued Microsoft and OpenAI over using their works to train ChatGPT. [114] [115]

Copyright of AI-generated material

A separate concern is whether AI-generated works can get approved for copyright protection. The United States Copyright Office has actually ruled that works developed by expert system without any human input can not be copyrighted, due to the fact that they do not have human authorship. [116] However, the office has also started taking public input to determine if these guidelines need to be refined for generative AI. [117]

Concerns

The advancement of generative AI has raised issues from federal governments, organizations, and people, leading to demonstrations, legal actions, contacts us to stop briefly AI experiments, and actions by numerous federal governments. In a July 2023 briefing of the United Nations Security Council, Secretary-General António Guterres specified “Generative AI has huge capacity for excellent and wicked at scale”, that AI might “turbocharge worldwide development” and contribute in between $10 and $15 trillion to the worldwide economy by 2030, however that its malicious usage “could cause horrific levels of death and destruction, prevalent injury, and deep mental damage on an unimaginable scale”. [118]

Job losses

From the early days of the development of AI, there have been arguments put forward by ELIZA developer Joseph Weizenbaum and others about whether tasks that can be done by computer systems actually ought to be done by them, given the distinction in between computer systems and human beings, and between quantitative calculations and qualitative, value-based judgements. [120] In April 2023, it was reported that image generation AI has actually resulted in 70% of the tasks for video game illustrators in China being lost. [121] [122] In July 2023, developments in generative AI contributed to the 2023 Hollywood labor disputes. Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild, stated that “expert system poses an existential threat to innovative occupations” during the 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike. [123] Voice generation AI has been seen as a potential difficulty to the voice acting sector. [124] [125]

The crossway of AI and work issues amongst underrepresented groups globally stays a crucial facet. While AI guarantees effectiveness improvements and ability acquisition, concerns about job displacement and biased recruiting procedures continue among these groups, as outlined in surveys by Fast Company. To take advantage of AI for a more fair society, proactive actions include mitigating predispositions, promoting transparency, appreciating privacy and authorization, and welcoming diverse groups and ethical considerations. Strategies include redirecting policy emphasis on regulation, inclusive design, and education’s potential for personalized mentor to make the most of advantages while minimizing damages. [126]

Racial and gender predisposition

Generative AI designs can reflect and enhance any cultural predisposition present in the underlying information. For example, a language model may presume that medical professionals and judges are male, and that secretaries or nurses are female, if those biases are typical in the training data. [127] Similarly, an image design prompted with the text “an image of a CEO” might disproportionately create pictures of white male CEOs, [128] if trained on a racially biased information set. A number of methods for reducing bias have been attempted, such as modifying input triggers [129] and reweighting training information. [130]

Deepfakes

Deepfakes (a portmanteau of “deep learning” and “fake” [131] are AI-generated media that take a person in an existing image or video and replace them with another person’s likeness utilizing artificial neural networks. [132] Deepfakes have actually amassed prevalent attention and issues for their uses in deepfake celeb pornographic videos, revenge porn, fake news, hoaxes, health disinformation, financial scams, and concealed foreign election interference. [133] [134] [135] [136] [137] [138] [139] This has actually generated reactions from both industry and federal government to discover and limit their usage. [140] [141]

In July 2023, the fact-checking business Logically found that the popular generative AI designs Midjourney, DALL-E 2 and Stable Diffusion would produce possible disinformation images when prompted to do so, such as images of electoral scams in the United States and Muslim women supporting India’s Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party. [142] [143]

In April 2024, a paper proposed to use blockchain (distributed journal innovation) to promote “transparency, verifiability, and decentralization in AI advancement and use”. [144]

Audio deepfakes

Instances of users abusing software to produce controversial statements in the vocal design of celebrities, public authorities, and other popular people have actually raised ethical concerns over voice generation AI. [145] [146] [147] [148] [149] [150] In action, business such as ElevenLabs have actually mentioned that they would work on mitigating possible abuse through safeguards and identity verification. [151]

Concerns and fandoms have spawned from AI-generated music. The same software utilized to clone voices has been utilized on popular musicians’ voices to develop tunes that simulate their voices, getting both remarkable appeal and criticism. [152] [153] [154] Similar methods have likewise been utilized to develop enhanced quality or full-length versions of tunes that have actually been dripped or have yet to be launched. [155]

Generative AI has actually also been utilized to develop new digital artist personalities, with a few of these receiving enough attention to receive record deals at major labels. [156] The designers of these virtual artists have actually also faced their reasonable share of criticism for their personified programs, including reaction for “dehumanizing” an artform, and likewise creating artists which produce impractical or unethical appeals to their audiences. [157]

Cybercrime

Generative AI’s ability to develop reasonable phony content has been made use of in various types of cybercrime, consisting of phishing frauds. [158] Deepfake video and audio have been utilized to develop disinformation and fraud. In 2020, previous Google click scams czar Shuman Ghosemajumder argued that once deepfake videos end up being perfectly reasonable, they would stop appearing amazing to audiences, possibly causing uncritical approval of incorrect details. [159] Additionally, big language designs and other types of text-generation AI have actually been utilized to create fake evaluations of e-commerce sites to enhance scores. [160] Cybercriminals have actually produced big language designs concentrated on scams, consisting of WormGPT and FraudGPT. [161]

A 2023 research study showed that generative AI can be susceptible to jailbreaks, reverse psychology and prompt injection attacks, allowing attackers to get assist with damaging requests, such as for crafting social engineering and phishing attacks. [162] Additionally, other researchers have actually shown that open-source designs can be fine-tuned to remove their safety limitations at low expense. [163]

Reliance on industry giants

Training frontier AI models needs an enormous amount of calculating power. Usually just Big Tech business have the funds to make such investments. Smaller start-ups such as Cohere and OpenAI end up purchasing access to information centers from Google and Microsoft respectively. [164]

Energy and environment

Scientists and reporters have actually expressed concerns about the environmental effect that the advancement and implementation of generative models are having: high CO2 emissions, [165] [166] [167] big amounts of freshwater used for data centers, [168] [169] and high quantities of electrical power usage. [170] [166] [171] There is likewise issue that these effects might increase as these models are included into extensively utilized search engines such as Google Search and Bing; [170] as chatbots and other applications end up being more popular; [170] [169] and as models need to be retrained. [170]

Proposed mitigation methods include factoring possible environmental expenses prior to design development or data collection, [165] increasing effectiveness of data centers to decrease electricity/energy use, [168] [170] [166] [169] [171] [167] constructing more efficient device learning models, [168] [166] [169] lessening the variety of times that models require to be retrained, [167] establishing a government-directed structure for auditing the ecological impact of these designs, [168] [167] controling for transparency of these designs, [167] managing their energy and water use, [168] motivating researchers to publish data on their designs’ carbon footprint, [170] [167] and increasing the number of subject experts who comprehend both maker knowing and climate science. [167]

Content quality

The New York Times specifies slop as analogous to spam: “shoddy or undesirable A.I. material in social networks, art, books and … in search outcomes.” [172] Journalists have expressed concerns about the scale of low-quality generated material with regard to social networks content small amounts, [173] the monetary rewards from social media companies to spread such content, [173] [174] false political messaging, [174] spamming of clinical research study paper submissions, [175] increased effort and time to find higher quality or wanted content on the Internet, [176] the indexing of produced content by search engines, [177] and on journalism itself. [178]

A paper published by researchers at Amazon Web Services AI Labs found that over 57% of sentences from a sample of over 6 billion sentences from Common Crawl, a photo of websites, were device equated. Many of these automated translations were viewed as lower quality, especially for sentences that were equated across at least 3 languages. Many lower-resource languages (ex. Wolof, Xhosa) were equated across more languages than higher-resource languages (ex. English, French). [179] [180]

In September 2024, Robyn Speer, the author of wordfreq, an open source database that computed word frequencies based on text from the Internet, revealed that she had actually stopped upgrading the data for numerous reasons: high expenses for obtaining data from Reddit and Twitter, extreme focus on generative AI compared to other techniques in the natural language processing community, and that “generative AI has polluted the data”. [181]

The adoption of generative AI tools led to a surge of AI-generated content throughout numerous domains. A research study from University College London approximated that in 2023, more than 60,000 scholarly articles-over 1% of all publications-were likely written with LLM support. [182] According to Stanford University’s Institute for Human-Centered AI, approximately 17.5% of recently released computer science papers and 16.9% of peer evaluation text now integrate content produced by LLMs. [183]

Visual material follows a comparable pattern. Since the launch of DALL-E 2 in 2022, it is approximated that approximately 34 million images have actually been created daily. As of August 2023, more than 15 billion images had been produced utilizing text-to-image algorithms, with 80% of these created by models based on Stable Diffusion. [184]

If AI-generated content is consisted of in brand-new information crawls from the Internet for extra training of AI models, problems in the resulting models may take place. [185] Training an AI model exclusively on the output of another AI model produces a lower-quality model. Repeating this procedure, where each brand-new model is trained on the previous design’s output, leads to progressive destruction and ultimately results in a “design collapse” after numerous iterations. [186] Tests have been carried out with pattern recognition of handwritten letters and with images of human faces. [187] As a consequence, the value of data gathered from genuine human interactions with systems might become significantly important in the existence of LLM-generated material in information crawled from the Internet.

On the other side, artificial information is frequently utilized as an alternative to data produced by real-world events. Such data can be deployed to validate mathematical models and to train maker learning designs while protecting user privacy, [188] consisting of for structured data. [189] The method is not restricted to text generation; image generation has actually been used to train computer vision models. [190]

Misuse in journalism

In January 2023, Futurism.com broke the story that CNET had been using a concealed internal AI tool to compose a minimum of 77 of its stories; after the news broke, CNET published corrections to 41 of the stories. [191]

In April 2023, the German tabloid Die Aktuelle published a phony AI-generated interview with former racing driver Michael Schumacher, who had not made any public looks because 2013 after sustaining a brain injury in a snowboarding mishap. The story included 2 possible disclosures: the cover included the line “stealthily genuine”, and the interview included an acknowledgment at the end that it was AI-generated. The editor-in-chief was fired soon thereafter in the middle of the debate. [192]

Other outlets that have actually released posts whose content and/or byline have been confirmed or believed to be produced by generative AI designs – frequently with incorrect material, mistakes, and/or non-disclosure of generative AI use – include:

– NewsBreak [193] [194]- outlets owned by Arena Group Sports Illustrated [195] TheStreet [195] Men’s Journal [196]
The Columbus Dispatch [198] [199] Reviewed [200] USA Today [201]
Gizmodo [205] Jalopnik [205] A.V. Club [205] [206] Quartz [207]
Bankrate [209]
Yoga Journal [201] Backpacker [201] Clean Eating [201]
Miami Herald [201] Sacramento Bee [201] Tacoma News Tribune [201] The Rock Hill Herald [201] The Modesto Bee [201] Fort Worth Star-Telegram [201] Merced Sun-Star [201] Ledger-Enquirer [201] The Kansas City Star [201] Raleigh News & Observer [217]
PC Magazine [201] Mashable [201] AskMen [201]
Good Housekeeping [201]
People [201] Parents [201] Food & Wine [201] InStyle [201] Real Simple [201] Travel + Leisure [201] Better Homes & Gardens [201] Southern Living [201]
LA Weekly [218] The Village Voice [218]

In May 2024, Futurism kept in mind that a content management system video by AdVon Commerce, who had utilized generative AI to produce posts for numerous of the previously mentioned outlets, appeared to reveal that they “had produced 10s of thousands of short articles for more than 150 publishers.” [201]

News broadcasters in Kuwait, Greece, South Korea, India, China and Taiwan have actually presented news with anchors based upon Generative AI designs, prompting concerns about job losses for human anchors and audience trust in news that has actually historically been influenced by parasocial relationships with broadcasters, material creators or social media influencers. [220] [221] [222] Algorithmically created anchors have also been utilized by allies of ISIS for their broadcasts. [223]

In 2023, Google apparently pitched a tool to news outlets that claimed to “produce newspaper article” based upon input data supplied, such as “details of present occasions”. Some news company executives who saw the pitch described it as” [taking] for approved the effort that entered into producing precise and artful news stories.” [224]

In February 2024, Google released a program to pay small publishers to compose three short articles daily using a beta generative AI design. The program does not need the knowledge or approval of the sites that the publishers are using as sources, nor does it require the published posts to be identified as being developed or helped by these designs. [225]

Many defunct news sites (The Hairpin, The Frisky, Apple Daily, Ashland Daily Tidings, Clayton County Register, Southwest Journal) and blogs (The Unofficial Apple Weblog, iLounge) have actually gone through cybersquatting, with short articles created by generative AI. [226] [227] [228] [229] [230] [231] [232] [233]

United States Senators Richard Blumenthal and Amy Klobuchar have actually revealed concern that generative AI might have a damaging effect on local news. [234] In July 2023, OpenAI partnered with the American Journalism Project to fund regional news outlets for exploring with generative AI, with Axios keeping in mind the possibility of generative AI business developing a reliance for these news outlets. [235]

Meta AI, a chatbot based upon Llama 3 which sums up news stories, was kept in mind by The Washington Post to copy sentences from those stories without direct attribution and to possibly more decrease the traffic of online news outlets. [236]

In action to possible pitfalls around the use and abuse of generative AI in journalism and fret about decreasing audience trust, outlets worldwide, including publications such as Wired, Associated Press, The Quint, Rappler or The Guardian have released standards around how they plan to utilize and not use AI and generative AI in their work. [237] [238] [239] [240]

In June 2024, Reuters Institute released their Digital New Report for 2024. In a study of individuals in America and Europe, Reuters Institute reports that 52% and 47% respectively are unpleasant with news produced by “primarily AI with some human oversight”, and 23% and 15% respectively report being comfy. 42% of Americans and 33% of Europeans reported that they were comfortable with news produced by “primarily human with some help from AI”. The results of worldwide surveys reported that individuals were more uneasy with news topics including politics (46%), criminal activity (43%), and local news (37%) produced by AI than other news topics. [241]

Computer programs website

Technology website

Artificial basic intelligence – Kind of AI with extensive capabilities
Artificial imagination – Artificial simulation of human creativity
Expert system art – Visual media created with AI
Artificial life – Discipline
Chatbot – Program that imitates conversation
Computational creativity – Multidisciplinary endeavour
Generative adversarial network – Deep knowing method
Generative pre-trained transformer – Kind of large language design
Large language design – Kind of artificial intelligence design
Music and expert system – Usage of artificial intelligence to produce music
Generative AI porn – Explicit product produced by generative AI
Procedural generation – Method in which information is created algorithmically instead of by hand
Retrieval-augmented generation – Type of info retrieval utilizing LLMs
Stochastic parrot – Term used in artificial intelligence

References

^ Newsom, Gavin; Weber, Shirley N. (September 5, 2023). “Executive Order N-12-23” (PDF). Executive Department, State of California. Archived (PDF) from the initial on February 21, 2024. Retrieved September 7, 2023.
^ Pinaya, Walter H. L.; Graham, Mark S.; Kerfoot, Eric; Tudosiu, Petru-Daniel; Dafflon, Jessica; Fernandez, Virginia; Sanchez, Pedro; Wolleb, Julia; da Costa, Pedro F.; Patel, Ashay (2023 ). “Generative AI for Medical Imaging: extending the MONAI Framework”. arXiv:2307.15208 [eess.IV]
^ “What is ChatGPT, DALL-E, and generative AI?”. McKinsey. Retrieved December 14, 2024.
^ “What is generative AI?”. IBM. March 22, 2024.
^ Pasick, Adam (March 27, 2023). “Expert System Glossary: Neural Networks and Other Terms Explained”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on September 1, 2023. Retrieved April 22, 2023.
^ Karpathy, Andrej; Abbeel, Pieter; Brockman, Greg; Chen, Peter; Cheung, Vicki; Duan, Yan; Goodfellow, Ian; Kingma, Durk; Ho, Jonathan; Rein Houthooft; Tim Salimans; John Schulman; Ilya Sutskever; Wojciech Zaremba (June 16, 2016). “Generative models”. OpenAI. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ a b Griffith, Erin; Metz, Cade (January 27, 2023). “Anthropic Said to Be Closing In on $300 Million in New A.I. Funding”. The New York City Times. Archived from the initial on December 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Lanxon, Nate; Bass, Dina; Davalos, Jackie (March 10, 2023). “A Cheat Sheet to AI Buzzwords and Their Meanings”. Bloomberg News. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (March 14, 2023). “OpenAI Plans to Up the Ante in Tech’s A.I. Race”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on March 31, 2023. Retrieved March 31, 2023.
^ Thoppilan, Romal; De Freitas, Daniel; Hall, Jamie; Shazeer, Noam; Kulshreshtha, Apoorv (January 20, 2022). “LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applications”. arXiv:2201.08239 [cs.CL]
^ Roose, Kevin (October 21, 2022). “A Coming-Out Party for Generative A.I., Silicon Valley’s New Craze”. The New York Times. Archived from the initial on February 15, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ a b Metz, Cade (February 15, 2024). “OpenAI Unveils A.I. That Instantly Generates Eye-Popping Videos”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on February 15, 2024. Retrieved February 16, 2024.
^ “The race of the AI labs heats up”. The Economist. January 30, 2023. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Yang, June; Gokturk, Burak (March 14, 2023). “Google Cloud brings generative AI to developers, organizations, and governments”. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Brynjolfsson, Erik; Li, Danielle; Raymond, Lindsey R. (April 2023), Generative AI at Work (Working Paper), Working Paper Series, doi:10.3386/ w31161, archived from the original on March 28, 2024, obtained January 21, 2024
^ “Don’t fear an AI-induced tasks apocalypse just yet”. The Economist. March 6, 2023. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Coyle, Jake (September 27, 2023). “In Hollywood authors’ battle versus AI, humans win (in the meantime)”. AP News. Associated Press. Archived from the original on April 3, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Harreis, H.; Koullias, T.; Roberts, Roger. “Generative AI: Unlocking the future of style”. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ “How Generative AI Can Augment Human Creativity”. Harvard Business Review. June 16, 2023. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the original on June 20, 2023. Retrieved June 20, 2023.
^ Hendrix, Justin (May 16, 2023). “Transcript: Senate Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing on Oversight of AI”. techpolicy.press. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Simon, Felix M.; Altay, Sacha; Mercier, Hugo (October 18, 2023). “Misinformation refilled? Fears about the impact of generative AI on misinformation are overblown”. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. doi:10.37016/ mr-2020-127. S2CID 264113883. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved November 16, 2023.
^ “New AI systems hit copyright law”. BBC News. August 1, 2023. Retrieved September 28, 2024.
^ Newquist, H. P. (1994 ). The Brain Makers: Genius, Ego, And Greed In The Quest For Machines That Think. New York: Macmillan/SAMS. pp. 45-53. ISBN 978-0-672-30412-5.
^ Sharkey, Noel (July 4, 2007), A programmable robotic from 60 AD, vol. 2611, New Scientist, archived from the initial on January 13, 2018, retrieved October 22, 2019
^ Brett, Gerard (July 1954), “The Automata in the Byzantine “Throne of Solomon””, Speculum, 29 (3 ): 477-487, doi:10.2307/ 2846790, ISSN 0038-7134, JSTOR 2846790, S2CID 163031682.
^ kelinich (March 8, 2014). “Maillardet’s Automaton”. The Franklin Institute. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2023. Retrieved August 24, 2023.
^ Grinstead, Charles Miller; Snell, James Laurie (1997 ). Introduction to Probability. American Mathematical Society. pp. 464-466. ISBN 978-0-8218-0749-1.
^ Bremaud, Pierre (March 9, 2013). Markov Chains: Gibbs Fields, Monte Carlo Simulation, and Queues. Springer Science & Business Media. p. ix. ISBN 978-1-4757-3124-8. Archived from the original on March 23, 2017.
^ Hayes, Brian (2013 ). “First Links in the Markov Chain”. American Scientist. 101 (2 ): 92. doi:10.1511/ 2013.101.92. ISSN 0003-0996. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved September 24, 2023.
^ Fine, Shai; Singer, Yoram; Tishby, Naftali (July 1, 1998). “The Hierarchical Hidden Markov Model: Analysis and Applications”. Machine Learning. 32 (1 ): 41-62. doi:10.1023/ A:1007469218079. ISSN 1573-0565. S2CID 3465810.
^ Crevier, Daniel (1993 ). AI: The Tumultuous Look For Expert System. New York City, New York City: BasicBooks. p. 109. ISBN 0-465-02997-3.
^ Bergen, Nathan; Huang, Angela (2023 ). “A Brief History of Generative AI” (PDF). Dichotomies: Generative AI: Navigating Towards a Much Better Future (2 ): 4. Archived (PDF) from the initial on August 10, 2023. Retrieved August 8, 2023.
^ a b Alting, Leo; Zhang, Hongchao (1989 ). “Computer assisted process planning: the cutting edge survey”. The International Journal of Production Research. 27 (4 ): 553-585. doi:10.1080/ 00207548908942569. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved October 3, 2023.
^ Chien, Steve (1998 ). “Automated preparation and scheduling for goal-based autonomous spacecraft”. IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications. 13 (5 ): 50-55. doi:10.1109/ 5254.722362.
^ Burstein, Mark H., ed. (1994 ). ARPA/Rome Laboratory Knowledge-based Planning and Scheduling Initiative Workshop Proceedings. The Advanced Research Projects Agency, Department of Defense, and Rome Laboratory, US Flying Force, Griffiss AFB. p. 219. ISBN 155860345X.
^ Pell, Barney; Bernard, Douglas E.; Chien, Steve A.; Gat, Erann; Muscettola, Nicola; Nayak, P. Pandurang; Wagner, Michael D.; Williams, Brian C. (1998 ). Bekey, George A. (ed.). An Autonomous Spacecraft Agent Prototype. Autonomous Robots Volume 5, No. 1. pp. 29-45. Our deliberator is a standard generative AI coordinator based upon the HSTS preparation framework (Muscettola, 1994), and our control element is a traditional spacecraft mindset control system (Hackney et al. 1993). We also add an architectural element clearly dedicated to world modeling (the mode identifier), and distinguish in between control and tracking.
^ Jebara, Tony (2012 ). Artificial intelligence: discriminative and generative. Vol. 755. Springer Science & Business Media.
^ Cao, Yihan; Li, Siyu; Liu, Yixin; Yan, Zhiling; Dai, Yutong; Yu, Philip S.; Sun, Lichao (March 7, 2023). “An Extensive Survey of AI-Generated Content (AIGC): A History of Generative AI from GAN to ChatGPT”. arXiv:2303.04226 [cs.AI]
^ “finetune-transformer-lm”. GitHub. Archived from the original on May 19, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Radford, Alec; Wu, Jeffrey; Child, Rewon; Luan, David; Amodei, Dario; Sutskever, Ilya (2019 ). “Language designs are not being watched multitask students” (PDF). OpenAI Blog.
^ Radford, Alec (June 11, 2018). “Improving language comprehending with unsupervised learning”. OpenAI. Retrieved October 6, 2024.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). “Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines utilizing Machine Learning”. Towards Data Science. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). “15. ai Creator exposes journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon”. The Guardian. Archived from the initial on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Anirudh VK (March 18, 2023). “Deepfakes Are Elevating Meme Culture, But At What Cost?”. Analytics India Magazine. Archived from the original on December 26, 2024. Retrieved December 18, 2024. While AI voice memes have been around in some kind because ’15. ai’ introduced in 2020, […] ^ Coldewey, Devin (January 5, 2021). “OpenAI’s DALL-E creates possible images of literally anything you ask it to”. TechCrunch. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ “Stable Diffusion Public Release”. Stability AI. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Lock, Samantha (December 5, 2022). “What is AI chatbot phenomenon ChatGPT and could it change people?”. The Guardian. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Huang, Haomiao (August 23, 2023). “How ChatGPT turned generative AI into an “anything tool””. Ars Technica. Retrieved September 21, 2024.
^ Bubeck, Sébastien; Chandrasekaran, Varun; Eldan, Ronen; Gehrke, Johannes; Horvitz, Eric; Kamar, Ece; Lee, Peter; Lee, Yin Tat; Li, Yuanzhi; Lundberg, Scott; Nori, Harsha; Palangi, Hamid; Ribeiro, Marco Tulio; Zhang, Yi (March 22, 2023). “Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early explores GPT-4”. arXiv:2303.12712 [cs.CL]
^ Schlagwein, Daniel; Willcocks, Leslie (September 13, 2023). “ChatGPT et al: The Ethics of Using (Generative) Artificial Intelligence in Research and Science”. Journal of Information Technology. 38 (2 ): 232-238. doi:10.1177/ 02683962231200411. S2CID 261753752.
^ “Meta open-sources multisensory AI design that integrates 6 types of information”. May 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2024.
^ Kruppa, Miles (December 6, 2023). “Google Announces AI System Gemini After Turmoil at Rival OpenAI”. The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Edwards, Benj (December 6, 2023). “Google launches Gemini-a powerful AI model it states can go beyond GPT-4”. Ars Technica. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (February 8, 2024). “Google Releases Gemini, an A.I.-Driven Chatbot and Voice Assistant”. The New York Times. Retrieved February 8, 2024.
^ “Introducing the next generation of Claude”. Retrieved March 4, 2024.
^ Nuñez, Michael (March 4, 2024). “Anthropic reveals Claude 3, going beyond GPT-4 and Gemini Ultra in benchmark tests”. Venture Beat. Retrieved April 9, 2024.
^ Pierce, David (June 20, 2024). “Anthropic has a quick new AI design – and a creative brand-new way to communicate with chatbots”. The Verge. Retrieved June 22, 2024.
^ Baptista, Eduardo (July 9, 2024). “China leads the world in adoption of generative AI, survey shows”. Reuters. Retrieved July 14, 2024.
^ “A History of Generative AI: From GAN to GPT-4”. March 21, 2023. Archived from the original on June 10, 2023. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
^ “Explainer: What is Generative AI, the innovation behind OpenAI’s ChatGPT?”. Reuters. March 17, 2023. Archived from the initial on March 30, 2023. Retrieved March 17, 2023.
^ Roose, Kevin (February 16, 2023). “Bing’s A.I. Chat: ‘I Wished to Be Alive.'”. The New York City Times. Archived from the original on April 15, 2023. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Bommasani, R.; Hudson, D. A.; Adeli, E.; Altman, R.; Arora, S.; von Arx, S.; Bernstein, M. S.; Bohg, J.; Bosselut, A; Brunskill, E.; Brynjolfsson, E. (August 16, 2021). “On the opportunities and dangers of foundation designs”. arXiv:2108.07258 [cs.LG]
^ Chen, Ming; Tworek, Jakub; Jun, Hongyu; Yuan, Qinyuan; Pinto, Hanyu Philippe De Oliveira; Kaplan, Jerry; Edwards, Haley; Burda, Yannick; Joseph, Nicholas; Brockman, Greg; Ray, Alvin (July 6, 2021). “Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code”. arXiv:2107.03374 [cs.LG]
^ “Purchasing Cursor”. Andreesen Horowitz.
^ Epstein, Ziv; Hertzmann, Aaron; Akten, Memo; Farid, Hany; Fjeld, Jessica; Frank, Morgan R. ; Groh, Matthew; Herman, Laura; Leach, Neil; Mahari, Robert; Pentland, Alex “Sandy”; Russakovsky, Olga; Schroeder, Hope; Smith, Amy (2023 ). “Art and the science of generative AI”. Science. 380 (6650 ): 1110-1111. arXiv:2306.04141. Bibcode:2023 Sci … 380.1110 E. doi:10.1126/ science.adh4451. PMID 37319193. S2CID 259095707.
^ Ramesh, Aditya; Pavlov, Mikhail; Goh, Gabriel; Gray, Scott; Voss, Chelsea; Radford, Alec; Chen, Mark; Sutskever, Ilya (2021 ). “Zero-shot text-to-image generation”. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. PMLR. pp. 8821-8831.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). “Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines utilizing Artificial intelligence”. Towards Data Science. Archived from the original on January 21, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). “15. ai Creator exposes journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Ruppert, Liana (January 18, 2021). “Make Portal’s GLaDOS And Other Beloved Characters Say The Weirdest Things With This App”. Game Informer. Archived from the original on January 18, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Kurosawa, Yuki (January 19, 2021). “ゲームキャラ音声読み上げソフト 15. ai 公開中 。 Undertale や Portal のキャラに好きなセリフを言ってもらえる” [Game Character Voice Reading Software “15. ai” Now Available. Get Characters from Undertale and Portal to Say Your Desired Lines] AUTOMATON (in Japanese). Archived from the original on January 19, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024. 英語版ボイスのみなので注意 。; もうひとつ15.aiの大きな特徴として挙げられるのが 、 豊かな感情表現だ 。 [Please note that only English voices are available.; Another major function of 15. ai is its abundant psychological expression.] ^ Desai, Saahil (July 17, 2023). “A Voicebot Just Left Me Speechless”. The Atlantic. Archived from the original on December 8, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Agostinelli, Andrea; Denk, Timo I.; Borsos, Zalán; Engel, Jesse; Verzetti, Mauro; Caillon, Antoine; Huang, Qingqing; Jansen, Aren; Roberts, Adam; Tagliasacchi, Marco; Sharifi, Matt; Zeghidour, Neil; Frank, Christian (January 26, 2023). “MusicLM: Generating Music From Text”. arXiv:2301.11325 [cs.SD]
^ Dalugdug, Mandy (August 3, 2023). “Meta in June stated that it utilized 20,000 hours of certified music to train MusicGen, that included 10,000 “premium” licensed music tracks. At the time, Meta’s researchers outlined in a paper the ethical difficulties that they came across around the development of generative AI designs like MusicGen”. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023.
^ “Jay-Z’s Delaware manufacturer stimulates dispute over AI rights”. Archived from the original on February 27, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ “10 “Best” AI Music Generators (April 2024) – Unite.AI”. October 19, 2022. Archived from the original on January 29, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ Metz, Cade (April 4, 2023). “Instant Videos Could Represent the Next Leap in A.I. Technology”. The New York Times. Archived from the initial on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 5, 2023.
^ Wong, Queenie (September 29, 2022). “Facebook Parent Meta’s AI Tool Can Create Artsy Videos From Text”. cnet.com. Archived from the initial on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 4, 2023.
^ Yang, Sherry; Du, Yilun (April 12, 2023). “UniPi: Learning universal policies through text-guided video generation”. Google Research, Brain Team. Google AI Blog. Archived from the initial on May 24, 2023.
^ Brohan, Anthony (2023 ). “RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control”. arXiv:2307.15818 [cs.RO]
^ Abdullahi, Aminu (November 17, 2023). “10 Best Expert System (AI) 3D Generators”. eWEEK. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ “Slash CAD model construct times with new AI-driven part production approach|GlobalSpec”. Archived from the initial on January 23, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ “The Role of Expert System (AI) in the CAD Industry”. March 22, 2023. Archived from the original on February 9, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Sabin, Sam (June 30, 2023). “GitHub has a vision to make code more safe by style”. Axios Codebook. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (March 20, 2023). “Text-to-video AI inches closer as startup Runway announces new design”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on September 27, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Text-to-video is the next frontier for generative AI, though present output is basic. Runway says it’ll be making its new generative video design, Gen-2, readily available to users in ‘the coming weeks.’
^ Vanian, Jonathan (March 16, 2023). “Microsoft adds OpenAI technology to Word and Excel”. CNBC. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Microsoft is bringing generative expert system innovations such as the popular ChatGPT talking app to its Microsoft 365 suite of service software … the new A.I. features, called Copilot, will be offered in some of the company’s most popular business apps, including Word, PowerPoint and Excel.
^ Wilson, Mark (August 15, 2023). “The app’s Memories feature just got a huge upgrade”. TechRadar. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. The Google Photos app is getting an upgraded, AI-powered Memories feature … you’ll have the ability to utilize generative AI to come up with some recommended names like “a desert experience”.
^ Sullivan, Laurie (May 23, 2023). “Adobe Adds Generative AI To Photoshop”. MediaPost. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Generative expert system (AI) will turn into one of the most important features for innovative designers and marketers. Adobe on Tuesday unveiled a Generative Fill feature in Photoshop to bring Firefly’s AI capabilities into style.
^ Michael Nuñez (July 19, 2023). “LLaMA 2: How to gain access to and use Meta’s versatile open-source chatbot right now”. VentureBeat. Archived from the original on November 3, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. If you wish to run LLaMA 2 by yourself maker or modify the code, you can download it directly from Hugging Face, a leading platform for sharing AI designs.
^ Pounder, Les (March 25, 2023). “How To Create Your Own AI Chatbot Server With Raspberry Pi 4”. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Using a Pi 4 with 8GB of RAM, you can create a ChatGPT-like server based on LLaMA.
^ Kemper, Jonathan (November 10, 2022). “”Draw Things” App brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone”. The Decoder. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Draw Things is an app that brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone. The AI images are created locally, so you don’t require a Web connection.
^ Witt, Allan (July 7, 2023). “Best Computer to Run LLaMA AI Model in the house (GPU, CPU, RAM, SSD)”. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. To run LLaMA model in the house, you will require a computer system develop with a powerful GPU that can deal with the big quantity of data and computation required for inferencing.
^ Westover, Brian (September 28, 2023). “Who Needs ChatGPT? How to Run Your Own Free and Private AI Chatbot”. Ziff Davis. Archived from the initial on January 7, 2024. Retrieved January 7, 2024.
^ @karpathy (December 20, 2023). “I pretty much only trust 2 LLM evals right now” (Tweet) – via Twitter.
^ @ylecun (January 5, 2024). “Nabla’s shift from ChatGPT to open source LLMs …” (Tweet) – via Twitter.
^ @ylecun (November 1, 2023). “Open source platforms * increase * security and security” (Tweet) – through Twitter.
^ Nellis, Stephen; Lee, Jane (September 1, 2022). “U.S. officials order Nvidia to stop sales of top AI chips to China”. Reuters. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Shilov, Anton (May 7, 2023). “Nvidia’s Chinese A800 GPU’s Performance Revealed”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved August 15, 2023. the A800 runs at 70% of the speed of A100 GPUs while adhering to rigorous U.S. export requirements that restrict just how much processing power Nvidia can offer.
^ Patel, Dylan (October 24, 2022). “How China’s Biren Is Attempting To Evade US Sanctions”. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ “5 complimentary software to recognise fake AI-generated images” (in Italian). October 28, 2023. Archived from the original on October 29, 2023. Retrieved October 29, 2023.
^ “Detecting AI fingerprints: A guide to watermarking and beyond”. Brookings Institution. January 4, 2024. Archived from the initial on September 3, 2024. Retrieved September 5, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (April 3, 2023). “We checked a new ChatGPT-detector for instructors. It flagged an innocent trainee”. washingtonpost.com. Archived from the initial on March 28, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (June 2, 2023). “Detecting AI might be difficult. That’s a big issue for teachers”. washingtonpost.com. Archived from the original on June 3, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Bartz, Diane; Hu, Krystal (July 21, 2023). “OpenAI, Google, others promise to watermark AI content for security, White House states”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023.
^ “FACT SHEET: President Biden Issues Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence”. The White House. October 30, 2023. Archived from the original on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Burt, Andrew (October 31, 2023). “3 Obstacles to Regulating Generative AI”. Harvard Business Review. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the initial on February 17, 2024. Retrieved February 17, 2024.
^ “EU AI Act: very first guideline on expert system”. European Parliament. August 6, 2023. Retrieved September 13, 2024.
^ Chee, Foo Yun; Mukherjee, Supantha (June 14, 2023). “EU legislators vote for tougher AI guidelines as draft relocate to last”. Reuters. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 26, 2023.
^ Ye, Josh (July 13, 2023). “China states generative AI rules to apply only to products for the general public”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 13, 2023.
^ “生成式人工智能服务管理暂行办法”. July 13, 2023. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ a b “Generative Artificial Intelligence and Copyright Law”. Congressional Research Service. LSB10922. September 29, 2023. Archived from the initial on March 22, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Thompson, Stuart (January 25, 2024). “We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image”. The New York Times. Archived from the initial on January 25, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Hadero, Haleluya; Bauder, David (December 27, 2023). “The New York Times takes legal action against OpenAI and Microsoft for using its stories to train chatbots”. Associated Press News. AP News. Archived from the original on December 27, 2023. Retrieved April 13, 2023.
^ O’Brien, Matt (September 25, 2023). “Photo giant Getty took a leading AI image-maker to court. Now it’s likewise accepting the innovation”. AP NEWS. Associated Press. Archived from the initial on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Barber, Gregory (December 9, 2023). “The Generative AI Copyright Fight Is Just Getting Going”. Wired. Archived from the original on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Bruell, Alexandra (December 27, 2023). “New York City Times Sues Microsoft and OpenAI, Alleging Copyright Infringement”. Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on January 18, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Brittain, Blake (August 21, 2023). “AI-generated art can not get copyrights, US court states”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on January 20, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ David, Emilla (August 29, 2023). “US Copyright Office wants to hear what people think of AI and copyright”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ “Secretary-General’s remarks to the Security Council on Expert System”. un.org. July 18, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 28, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ “The Writers Strike Is Deciding on AI”. Time. May 4, 2023. Archived from the initial on June 11, 2023. Retrieved June 11, 2023.
^ Tarnoff, Ben (August 4, 2023). “Lessons from Eliza”. The Guardian Weekly. pp. 34-39.
^ Zhou, Viola (April 11, 2023). “AI is currently taking video game illustrators’ tasks in China”. Rest of World. Archived from the initial on August 13, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Carter, Justin (April 11, 2023). “China’s video game art market supposedly decimated by growing AI use”. Game Developer. Archived from the original on August 17, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Collier, Kevin (July 14, 2023). “Actors vs. AI: Strike brings focus to emerging usage of advanced tech”. NBC News. Archived from the on July 20, 2023. Retrieved July 21, 2023. SAG-AFTRA has actually signed up with the Writer’s [sic] Guild of America in demanding an agreement that explicitly demands AI regulations to safeguard authors and the works they create. … The future of generative expert system in Hollywood-and how it can be utilized to change labor-has end up being an essential sticking point for actors going on strike. In a press conference Thursday, Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (more frequently known as SAG-AFTRA), declared that ‘expert system presents an existential danger to creative professions, and all stars and entertainers should have agreement language that protects them from having their identity and talent made use of without consent and pay.’
^ Wiggers, Kyle (August 22, 2023). “ElevenLabs’ voice-generating tools introduce out of beta”. TechCrunch. Archived from the initial on November 28, 2023. Retrieved September 25, 2023.
^ Shrivastava, Rashi. “‘Keep Your Paws Off My Voice’: Voice Actors Worry Generative AI Will Steal Their Livelihoods”. Forbes. Archived from the original on December 2, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Gupta, Shalene (October 31, 2023). “Underrepresented groups in countries around the world are stressed over AI being a threat to tasks”. Fast Company. Archived from the original on December 8, 2023. Retrieved December 8, 2023.
^ Rachel Gordon (March 3, 2023). “Large language models are biased. Can reasoning assist save them?”. MIT CSAIL. Archived from the original on January 23, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ OpenAI (July 18, 2022). “Reducing bias and improving safety in DALL · E 2”. OpenAI. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Jake Traylor (July 27, 2022). “No fast fix: How OpenAI’s DALL · E 2 illustrated the difficulties of predisposition in AI”. NBC News. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ “DALL · E 2 pre-training mitigations”. OpenAI. June 28, 2022. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Brandon, John (February 16, 2018). “Terrifying high-tech pornography: Creepy ‘deepfake’ videos are on the increase”. Fox News. Archived from the original on June 15, 2018. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ Cole, Samantha (January 24, 2018). “We Are Truly Fucked: Everyone Is Making AI-Generated Fake Porn Now”. Vice. Archived from the original on September 7, 2019. Retrieved May 4, 2019.
^ “What Are Deepfakes & Why the Future of Porn is Terrifying”. Highsnobiety. February 20, 2018. Archived from the original on July 14, 2021. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ “Experts fear face switching tech might start a worldwide face-off”. The Outline. Archived from the initial on January 16, 2020. Retrieved February 28, 2018.
^ Roose, Kevin (March 4, 2018). “Here Come the Fake Videos, Too”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on June 18, 2019. Retrieved March 24, 2018.
^ Schreyer, Marco; Sattarov, Timur; Reimer, Bernd; Borth, Damian (2019 ). “Adversarial Learning of Deepfakes in Accounting”. arXiv:1910.03810 [cs.LG]
^ Menz, Bradley (2024 ). “Health Disinformation Use Case Highlighting the Urgent Need for Artificial Intelligence Vigilance”. JAMA Internal Medicine. 184 (1 ): 92-96. doi:10.1001/ jamainternmed.2023.5947. PMID 37955873. S2CID 265148637. Archived from the original on February 4, 2024. Retrieved February 4, 2024.
^ Chalfant, Morgan (March 6, 2024). “U.S. braces for foreign disturbance in 2024 election”. Semafor. Archived from the initial on March 11, 2024. Retrieved March 6, 2024.
^ Menn, Joseph (September 23, 2024). “Russia, Iran utilize AI to improve anti-U.S. influence campaigns, officials state”. The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on September 24, 2024. Retrieved September 23, 2024.
^ “Join the Deepfake Detection Challenge (DFDC)”. deepfakedetectionchallenge.ai. Archived from the initial on January 12, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2019.
^ Clarke, Yvette D. (June 28, 2019). “H.R. 3230 – 116th Congress (2019-2020): Defending Each and Every Person from False Appearances by Keeping Exploitation Subject to Accountability Act of 2019”. www.congress.gov. Archived from the original on December 17, 2019. Retrieved October 16, 2019.
^ “New Research Reveals Scale of Threat Posed by AI-generated Images on 2024 Elections”. Logically. July 27, 2023. Archived from the original on October 3, 2023. Retrieved July 6, 2024.
^ Lawton, Graham (September 12, 2023). “Disinformation wars: The fight against phony news in the age of AI”. New Scientist. Retrieved July 5, 2024.
^ Brewer, Jordan; Patel, Dhru; Kim, Dennie; Murray, Alex (April 12, 2024). “Navigating the difficulties of generative innovations: Proposing the integration of expert system and blockchain”. Business Horizons. 67 (5 ): 525-535. doi:10.1016/ j.bushor.2024.04.011. ISSN 0007-6813.
^ “People Are Still Terrible: AI Voice-Cloning Tool Misused for Deepfake Celeb Clips”. PCMag Middle East. January 31, 2023. Archived from the original on December 25, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “The generative A.I. software race has actually started”. Fortune. Archived from the initial on March 25, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Milmo, Dan; Hern, Alex (May 20, 2023). “Elections in UK and US at threat from AI-driven disinformation, say specialists”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on November 16, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “Seeing is believing? Global scramble to deal with deepfakes”. news.yahoo.com. Archived from the original on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (January 31, 2023). “4chan users welcome AI voice clone tool to create celeb hatespeech”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on December 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Thompson, Stuart A. (March 12, 2023). “Making Deepfakes Gets Cheaper and Easier Thanks to A.I.” The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on October 29, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “A brand-new AI voice tool is currently being abused to make deepfake celeb audio clips”. Engadget. January 31, 2023. Archived from the original on October 10, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Gee, Andre (April 20, 2023). “Even If AI-Generated Rap Songs Go Viral Doesn’t Mean They’re Good”. Rolling Stone. Archived from the original on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Coscarelli, Joe (April 19, 2023). “An A.I. Hit of Fake ‘Drake’ and ‘The Weeknd’ Rattles the Music World”. The New York Times. Archived from the initial on May 15, 2023. Retrieved December 5, 2023.
^ Lippiello, Emily; Smith, Nathan; Pereira, Ivan (November 3, 2023). “AI songs that simulate popular artists raising alarms in the music industry”. ABC News. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Skelton, Eric. “Fans Are Using Expert System to Turn Rap Snippets Into Full Songs”. Complex. Archived from the original on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Marr, Bernard. “Virtual Influencer Noonoouri Lands Record Deal: Is She The Future Of Music?”. Forbes. Archived from the initial on December 4, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Thaler, Shannon (September 8, 2023). “Warner Music signs first-ever record deal with AI pop star”. New York City Post. Archived from the initial on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Sjouwerman, Stu (December 26, 2022). “Deepfakes: Prepare yourself for phishing 2.0”. Fast Company. Archived from the original on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Sonnemaker, Tyler. “As social networks platforms brace for the inbound wave of deepfakes, Google’s former ‘scams czar’ anticipates the biggest danger is that deepfakes will ultimately become dull”. Business Insider. Archived from the initial on April 14, 2021. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Collinson, Patrick (July 15, 2023). “Fake reviews: can we trust what we checked out online as use of AI blows up?”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on November 22, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ “After WormGPT, FraudGPT Emerges to Help Scammers Steal Your Data”. PCMAG. July 25, 2023. Archived from the original on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Gupta, Maanak; Akiri, Charankumar; Aryal, Kshitiz; Parker, Eli; Praharaj, Lopamudra (2023 ). “From ChatGPT to ThreatGPT: Impact of Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacy”. IEEE Access. 11: 80218-80245. arXiv:2307.00691. Bibcode:2023 IEEEA..1180218 G. doi:10.1109/ ACCESS.2023.3300381. S2CID 259316122.
^ Piper, Kelsey (February 2, 2024). “Should we make our most effective AI models open source to all?”. Vox. Retrieved January 13, 2025.
^ Metz, Cade (July 10, 2023). “In the Age of A.I., Tech’s Little Guys Need Big Friends”. New York Times.
^ a b Bender, Emily M.; Gebru, Timnit; McMillan-Major, Angelina; Shmitchell, Shmargaret (March 1, 2021). “On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models be Too Big?”. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. FAccT ’21. New York City, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 610-623. doi:10.1145/ 3442188.3445922. ISBN 978-1-4503-8309-7.
^ a b c d “AI is an energy hog. This is what it indicates for environment modification”. MIT Technology Review. May 23, 2024. Archived from the original on August 20, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f g Dhar, Payal (August 1, 2020). “The carbon impact of artificial intelligence”. Nature Machine Intelligence. 2 (8 ): 423-425. doi:10.1038/ s42256-020-0219-9. ISSN 2522-5839. Archived from the initial on August 14, 2024.
^ a b c d e Crawford, Kate (February 20, 2024). “Generative AI’s environmental expenses are skyrocketing – and mainly secret”. Nature. 626 (8000 ): 693. Bibcode:2024 Natur.626..693 C. doi:10.1038/ d41586-024-00478-x. PMID 38378831. Archived from the initial on August 22, 2024.
^ a b c d Rogers, Reece. “AI’s Energy Demands Are Out of Control. Welcome to the Internet’s Hyper-Consumption Era”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on August 14, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f Saenko, Kate (May 23, 2023). “Is generative AI bad for the environment? A computer system scientist discusses the carbon footprint of ChatGPT and its cousins”. The Conversation. Archived from the original on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Lohr, Steve (August 26, 2024). “Will A.I. Ruin the Planet or Save the Planet?”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hoffman, Benjamin (June 11, 2024). “First Came ‘Spam.’ Now, With A.I., We’ve Got ‘Slop'”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b “Investigation Finds Actual Source of All That AI Slop on Facebook”. Futurism. August 10, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Warzel, Charlie (August 21, 2024). “The MAGA Aesthetic Is AI Slop”. The Atlantic. Archived from the initial on August 25, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Edwards, Benj (August 14, 2024). “Research AI model suddenly attempts to modify its own code to extend runtime”. Ars Technica. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hern, Alex; Milmo, Dan (May 19, 2024). “Spam, junk … slop? The latest wave of AI behind the ‘zombie web'”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Cox, Joseph (January 18, 2024). “Google News Is Boosting Garbage AI-Generated Articles”. 404 Media. Archived from the original on June 13, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Beloved Local Newspapers Fired Staffers, Then Started Running AI Slop”. Futurism. July 31, 2024. Archived from the original on August 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Thompson, Brian; Dhaliwal, Mehak; Frisch, Peter; Domhan, Tobias; Federico, Marcello (August 2024). Ku, Lun-Wei; Martins, Andre; Srikumar, Vivek (eds.). “A Stunning Amount of the Web is Machine Translated: Insights from Multi-Way Parallelism”. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024. Bangkok, Thailand and virtual conference: Association for Computational Linguistics: 1763-1775. arXiv:2401.05749. doi:10.18653/ v1/2024. findings-acl.103.
^ Roscoe, Jules (January 17, 2024). “A ‘Shocking’ Amount of the Web Is Already AI-Translated Trash, Scientists Determine”. VICE. Archived from the original on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (September 19, 2024). “Project Analyzing Human Language Usage Shuts Down Because ‘Generative AI Has Polluted the Data'”. 404 Media. Archived from the initial on September 19, 2024. Retrieved September 20, 2024. While there has always been spam on the internet and in the datasets that Wordfreq used, “it was workable and frequently identifiable. Large language designs create text that masquerades as real language with intent behind it, even though there is none, and their output crops up everywhere,” she composed. She gives the example that ChatGPT overuses the word “dive,” in such a way that people do not, which has actually shaken off the frequency of this particular word.
^ Gray, Andrew (March 24, 2024). “ChatGPT “contamination”: estimating the occurrence of LLMs in the academic literature”. arXiv:2403.16887 [cs.DL]
^ Kannan, Prabha (May 13, 2024). “Just How Much Research Is Being Written by Large Language Models?”. Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. Stanford University. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Valyaeva, Alina (August 15, 2023). “AI Image Statistics for 2024: Just How Much Content Was Created by AI”. Everypixel Journal. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Shumailov, Ilia; Shumaylov, Zakhar; Zhao, Yiren; Papernot, Nicolas; Anderson, Ross; Gal, Yarin (July 2024). “AI models collapse when trained on recursively generated information”. Nature. 631 (8022 ): 755-759. Bibcode:2024 Natur.631..755 S. doi:10.1038/ s41586-024-07566-y. PMC 11269175. PMID 39048682.
^ Bhatia, Aatish (August 26, 2024). “When A.I.’s Output Is a Danger to A.I. Itself”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Self-Consuming Generative Models Go Mad”. ICLR. 2024.
^ Owen, Sean (April 12, 2023). “Synthetic Data for Better Machine Learning”. databricks.com. Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Sharma, Himanshu (July 11, 2023). “Synthetic Data Platforms: Unlocking the Power of Generative AI for Structured Data”. kdnuggets.com. Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Stöckl, Andreas (November 2, 2022). “Evaluating an Artificial Image Dataset Generated with Stable Diffusion”. arXiv:2211.01777 [cs.CV]
^ Roth, Emma (January 25, 2023). “CNET found mistakes in majority of its AI-written stories”. The Verge. Archived from the original on November 6, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ “A publication touted Michael Schumacher’s first interview in years. It was in fact AI“. NPR. April 28, 2023. Archived from the initial on June 17, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor (January 3, 2024). “Police Say AI-Generated Article About Local Murder Is “Entirely” Made Up”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on January 5, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ “NewsBreak: Most downloaded US news app has Chinese roots and ‘composes fiction’ utilizing AI”. Reuters. June 5, 2024. Archived from the original on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ a b Harrison, Maggie (November 27, 2023). “Sports Illustrated Published Articles by Fake, AI-Generated Writers”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 15, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 9, 2023). “Magazine Publishes Serious Errors in First AI-Generated Health Article”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Schneider, Jaron (December 14, 2023). “B&H Photo Published an AI-Generated Guide Written by a Fake Person”. PetaPixel. Archived from the original on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Harrison, Maggie (August 29, 2023). “USA Today Owner Pauses AI Articles After Butchering Sports Coverage”. Futurism. Archived from the original on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Buchanan, Tyler (August 28, 2023). “Dispatch pauses AI sports composing program”. Axios. Archived from the initial on January 1, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Sommer, Will (October 26, 2023). “Mysterious bylines appeared on an U.S.A. Today website. Did these authors exist?”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on October 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab a/c “Meet AdVon, the AI-Powered Content Monster Infecting the Media Industry”. Futurism. May 8, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 4, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ O’Sullivan, Donie; Gordon, Allison (November 2, 2023). “How Microsoft’s AI is making a mess of the news|CNN Business”. CNN. Archived from the original on November 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Meade, Amanda (July 31, 2023). “News Corp using AI to produce 3,000 Australian regional newspaper article a week”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on December 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Tangermann, Victor (June 30, 2023). “Gizmodo Staff Furious After Site Announces Transfer To AI Content”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ a b c Kafka, Peter (July 18, 2023). “Coming to your web, whether you like it or not: More AI-generated stories”. Vox. Archived from the initial on July 18, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Landymore, Frank; Christian, Jon (September 13, 2023). “The A.V. Club’s AI-Generated Articles Are Copying Directly From IMDb”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Stiaplame, Nordiisk (January 28, 2025). “Quartz Is Publishing AI-Generated Articles Based Upon Other AI Slop, Together With Warning They May Be Filled With Errors”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on January 29, 2025. Retrieved January 30, 2025.
^ Carroll, Rory (May 14, 2023). “Irish Times apologises for scam AI post about ladies’s use of fake tan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on May 14, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 1, 2023). “CNET Sister Site Restarts AI Articles, Immediately Publishes Idiotic Error”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on November 27, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor; Christian, Jon (March 30, 2023). “BuzzFeed Is Quietly Publishing Entire AI-Generated Articles”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ “Newsweek is making generative AI a component in its newsroom”. Nieman Lab. April 17, 2024. Archived from the initial on May 15, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “What remains in a byline? For Hoodline’s AI-generated regional news, whatever – and absolutely nothing”. Nieman Lab. June 3, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ “AI-generated news is here from S.F.-based Hoodline. What does that mean for standard publishers?”. San Francisco Chronicle. May 8, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 5, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ Gold, Hadas (May 30, 2024). “A national network of regional news websites is releasing AI-written short articles under phony bylines. Experts are raising alarm”. CNN. Archived from the initial on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ “Wyoming press reporter captured utilizing artificial intelligence to develop phony quotes and stories”. Associated Press. August 14, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Cosmos Magazine publishes AI-generated posts, drawing criticism from reporters, co-founders”. ABC News. August 7, 2024. Archived from the original on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “AI-generated posts are penetrating significant news publications”. National Public Radio. May 16, 2024. Archived from the original on June 19, 2024. Retrieved July 8, 2024.
^ a b c Knibbs, Kate (July 30, 2024). “Zombie Alt-Weeklies Are Stuffed With AI Slop About OnlyFans”. Wired. Archived from the initial on August 11, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Apple states it will upgrade AI function after unreliable news alerts”. The Guardian. January 7, 2025. Archived from the original on January 14, 2025. Retrieved January 14, 2025.
^ “TV channels are utilizing AI-generated presenters to check out the news. The concern is, will we trust them?”. BBC News. January 26, 2024. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Tait, Amelia (October 20, 2023). “‘Here is the news. You can’t stop us’: AI anchor Zae-In grants us an interview”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on January 28, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kuo, Lily (November 9, 2018). “World’s very first AI news anchor unveiled in China”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on February 20, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “These ISIS news anchors are AI phonies. Their propaganda is genuine”. Washington Post. May 17, 2024. Archived from the initial on May 19, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Mullin, Benjamin; Grant, Nico (July 20, 2023). “Google Tests A.I. Tool That Is Able to Write News Articles”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on May 16, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Stenberg, Mark (February 27, 2024). “Google Is Paying Publishers Five-Figure Sums to Test an Unreleased Gen AI Platform”. Adweek. Archived from the initial on March 9, 2024. Retrieved April 17, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 7, 2024). “Confessions of an AI Clickbait Kingpin”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on May 18, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (January 26, 2024). “How Beloved Indie Blog ‘The Hairpin’ Became an AI Clickbait Farm”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on April 14, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (July 9, 2024). “A Beloved Tech Blog Is Now Publishing AI Articles Under the Names of Its Old Human Staff”. 404 Media. Archived from the original on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hollister, Sean (July 10, 2024). “Early Apple tech bloggers are stunned to find their name and work have actually been AI-zombified”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “AI slop is already invading Oregon’s regional journalism”. Oregon Public Broadcasting. December 9, 2024. Archived from the original on December 9, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 26, 2024). “How a Small Iowa Newspaper’s Website Became an AI-Generated Clickbait Factory”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on February 26, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason; Cole, Samantha; Maiberg, Emanuel; Cox, Joseph (January 26, 2024). “We Need Your Email Address”. 404 Media. Archived from the original on December 2, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ “Meet the Serbian Businessman/DJ Who Runs the Zombie AI Southwest Journal – Racket”. Racket. February 16, 2024. Archived from the original on November 13, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Lima-Strong, Cristiano (January 11, 2024). “Senators warn AI could cause ‘destruction’ of regional news”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on January 11, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “OpenAI strikes $5 million-plus local news offer”. Axios. July 18, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 19, 2023. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kelly, Heather (May 22, 2024). “Meta ignored news. Now the business’s utilizing it for AI content”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on May 22, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “How WIRED Will Use Generative AI Tools”. Wired. Archived from the initial on December 30, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Barrett, Amanda (November 15, 2018). “Standards around generative AI”. Associated Press. Archived from the original on September 23, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Viner, Katharine; Bateson, Anna (June 16, 2023). “The Guardian’s method to generative AI”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Becker, K. B.; Simon, F. M.; Crum, C. (2023 ). “Policies in parallel? A comparative research study of journalistic AI policies in 52 global news organisations”. pp. 8-9. doi:10.31235/ osf.io/ c4af9.
^ Newman, Nic; Fletcher, Richard; Robertson, Craig T.; Arguedas, Amy Ross; Nielsen, Rasmus Fleis (June 2024). “Digital Report 2024” (PDF). Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.

Bottom Promo
Bottom Promo
Top Promo